MOTO vs VOO
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MOTO or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MOTO led over 1Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOTO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 39 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +14.53%Best | +12.74% |
| 1Y Return | +27.13%Best | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.20% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.60% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.8% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,423 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.2% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | SmartETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2019 to Sep 8, 2026 (6.8 years).
MOTO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
MOTO vs VOO Performance
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is an ETF from SmartETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOTO returned +27.13% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, MOTO is up 14.53% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, MOTO compounded at +16.20% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.60% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, MOTO has the edge at +15.53% annualized vs +15.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOTO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.8% compared with 16.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.2% for MOTO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOTO charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOTO currently yields 0.91% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
36.4% of MOTO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.2% of VOO's money is in holdings MOTO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in MOTO and 504 in VOO, against full books of 39 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 483 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MOTO (86.1% of the fund), and 8 for MOTO that do not appear in VOO (16.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOTO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.09% | 7.51% | 3.42% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C | 4.18% | 2.59% | 1.59% |
| PWRQuanta Services, Inc | 4.71% | 0.17% | 4.54% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 4.44% | 0.34% | 4.10% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 4.11% | 0.30% | 3.81% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 2.50% | 1.84% | 0.66% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 3.63% | 0.26% | 3.37% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors N.V. Common Stock | 3.11% | 0.11% | 3.00% |
| ONOn Semiconductor Corp | 2.64% | 0.06% | 2.58% |
| APTVAptiv Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.63% | 0.02% | 1.61% |
36.4% of MOTO is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOTO or VOO?
MOTO has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOTO or VOO?
Over the past year MOTO returned +27.13% vs +19.43% for VOO, so MOTO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), MOTO annualized +15.53% vs +15.42% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOTO or VOO?
MOTO has been the more volatile fund at 24.8% annualized versus 16.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MOTO -38.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MOTO and VOO?
MOTO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOTO and VOO?
36.4% of MOTO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.2% of VOO's is in holdings MOTO also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in MOTO and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOTO or VOO?
MOTO yields 0.91% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MOTO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MOTO led over 1Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.