MOTO vs VOO
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MOTO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOTO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.87% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.00% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.50% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.12% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.78% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SmartETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MOTO vs VOO Performance
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is a ETF from SmartETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOTO returned +29.50% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, MOTO is up 17.00% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, MOTO compounded at +16.12% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.78% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, MOTO has the edge at +16.08% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOTO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.2% for MOTO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOTO charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOTO currently yields 0.87% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MOTO and VOO share 11 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOTO or VOO?
MOTO has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOTO or VOO?
Over the past year MOTO returned +29.50% vs +22.02% for VOO, so MOTO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), MOTO annualized +16.08% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOTO or VOO?
MOTO has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MOTO -38.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MOTO and VOO?
MOTO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOTO and VOO?
MOTO and VOO share 11 common holdings with a 9.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOTO or VOO?
MOTO yields 0.87% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.