MSTZ vs VTI
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MSTZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $96M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -59.34% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.78% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 189.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MSTZ vs VTI Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSTZ returned +25.78% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, MSTZ is down 59.34% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 189.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.4% for MSTZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTZ charges 1.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSTZ and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MSTZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSTR | -5.75% | 0.04% | 5.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTZ or VTI?
MSTZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSTZ or VTI?
Over the past year MSTZ returned +25.78% vs +22.35% for VTI, so MSTZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTZ annualized -89.45% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSTZ or VTI?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 189.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSTZ -99.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSTZ and VTI?
MSTZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSTZ and VTI?
MSTZ and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTZ or VTI?
MSTZ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.