MSTZ vs VTI

MSTZ vs VTI

Which is better, MSTZ or VTI?

Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMSTZVTI
Expense Ratio1.05%0.03%Best
AUM$101M$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings93,524
YTD Return-84.40%+13.35%Best
1Y Return-42.63%+15.92%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.41%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.83%
Volatility (annualized)185.1%12.7%Best
Max Drawdown--19.3%
$10,000 over 2 years$56$13,915Best
Fund FamilyREX SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleLeverage StrategyLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 18, 2024May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 18, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2 years).

MSTZ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.

MSTZ vs VTI Performance

T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSTZ returned -42.63% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, MSTZ is down 84.40% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 185.1% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.22. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MSTZ charges 1.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MSTZ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MSTZVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MSTZ or VTI?

MSTZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MSTZ or VTI?

Over the past year MSTZ returned -42.63% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTZ annualized -92.51% vs +17.96% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MSTZ or VTI?

MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 185.1% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI.

Should I hold both MSTZ and VTI?

MSTZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MSTZ or VTI?

MSTZ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than MSTZ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.