MSTZ vs VOO
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MSTZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $96M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -53.63% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +48.74% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 188.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MSTZ vs VOO Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSTZ returned +48.74% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, MSTZ is down 53.63% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 188.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.4% for MSTZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTZ charges 1.05% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MSTZ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTZ or VOO?
MSTZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSTZ or VOO?
Over the past year MSTZ returned +48.74% vs +20.92% for VOO, so MSTZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTZ annualized -88.74% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSTZ or VOO?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 188.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MSTZ -99.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MSTZ and VOO?
MSTZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSTZ and VOO?
MSTZ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTZ or VOO?
MSTZ yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.