MTAW vs QQQ
Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MTAW or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MTAW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 25 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -2.24% | +15.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.93% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.2% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MTAW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MTAW vs QQQ Performance
Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (MTAW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, MTAW is down 2.24% versus a gain of 15.21% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MTAW charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTAW currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
45.0% of MTAW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 22.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings MTAW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in MTAW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 25 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 87 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for MTAW (75.0% of the fund), and 11 for MTAW that do not appear in QQQ (36.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MTAW | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 20.12% | 2.78% | 17.34% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.78% | 8.44% | 4.66% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.92% | 3.45% | 0.53% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.18% | 3.16% | 0.02% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.54% | 3.13% | 0.59% |
| YNDXYandex Nv Ord Eur.01 Cl A Nasdaq Stock Exchange | 4.33% | 0.21% | 4.12% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.25% | 0.73% | 2.52% |
| ARMArm Holdings Plc Adr | 2.95% | 0.51% | 2.44% |
| CRWVCoreweave, Inc. | 1.98% | 0.18% | 1.80% |
45.0% of MTAW is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MTAW or QQQ?
MTAW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MTAW and QQQ?
45.0% of MTAW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 22.6% of QQQ's is in holdings MTAW also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in MTAW and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTAW or QQQ?
MTAW yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MTAW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.