IVV vs MTAW

IVV vs MTAW

Which is better, IVV or MTAW?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMTAW
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.59%
AUM$876.4B$2M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50825
YTD Return+11.51%Best-2.87%
1Y Return+15.96%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.01%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.66%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best57.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Harbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs MTAW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs MTAW Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (MTAW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a loss of 2.87% for MTAW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MTAW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MTAW.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in MTAW18.0%
MTAW already in IVV63.3%

18.0% of IVV's money is in holdings MTAW also owns. 63.3% of MTAW's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

14 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 25 in MTAW, against full books of 508 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 6 positions for MTAW that do not appear in our book for IVV (18.2% of the fund), and 468 for IVV that do not appear in MTAW (80.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MTAWDifference
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%20.12%18.22%
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%3.78%4.29%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%3.18%0.53%
GLWCorning Inc.0.18%4.92%4.74%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common0.38%4.56%4.18%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.39%2.54%0.15%
NEENextera Energy Inc0.26%3.89%3.63%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.16%2.92%1.76%
CIENCiena Corp0.08%3.59%3.51%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.0.27%3.25%2.98%

63.3% of MTAW is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVMTAW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MTAW?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MTAW charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MTAW?

63.3% of MTAW's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 63.3% of MTAW's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 25 in MTAW.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MTAW?

IVV yields 1.06% while MTAW yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MTAW better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.