MTRA vs QQQ
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MTRA or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. MTRA is less concentrated, with 41.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MTRA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $137M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 114 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -1.36% | +22.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.49% | +23.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.53% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.67% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 19.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,422 | $14,105Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.3%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 11, 2025 to Oct 9, 2026 (1.3 years).
MTRA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
MTRA vs QQQ Performance
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MTRA returned +0.49% while QQQ returned +23.60%. Year to date, MTRA is down 1.36% versus a gain of 22.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 12.7% for MTRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for MTRA and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MTRA charges 0.54% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $18 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTRA currently yields 0.56% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of MTRA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings MTRA also owns.
MTRA and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in MTRA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 114 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for MTRA (97.2% of the fund), and 8 for MTRA that do not appear in QQQ (10.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MTRA | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.60% | 0.68% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MTRA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MTRA or QQQ?
MTRA has an expense ratio of 0.54% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MTRA or QQQ?
Over the past year MTRA returned +0.49% vs +23.60% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MTRA annualized +3.23% vs +30.29% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MTRA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 12.7% for MTRA. Worst drawdown: MTRA -15.8% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both MTRA and QQQ?
MTRA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MTRA and QQQ?
1.3% of MTRA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.6% of QQQ's is in holdings MTRA also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in MTRA and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTRA or QQQ?
MTRA yields 0.56% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so MTRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MTRA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. MTRA is less concentrated, with 41.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.