MTRA vs QQQ
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MTRA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $138M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.57% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.76% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MTRA vs QQQ Performance
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MTRA returned +10.76% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, MTRA is up 2.57% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.5% for MTRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for MTRA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MTRA charges 0.54% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $18 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTRA currently yields 0.54% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MTRA and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 158 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MTRA or QQQ?
MTRA has an expense ratio of 0.54% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MTRA or QQQ?
Over the past year MTRA returned +10.76% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MTRA annualized +7.22% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MTRA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.5% for MTRA. Worst drawdown: MTRA -15.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MTRA and QQQ?
MTRA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MTRA and QQQ?
MTRA and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 158 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTRA or QQQ?
MTRA yields 0.54% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so MTRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.