MTRA vs VOO
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MTRA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $138M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.57% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.76% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MTRA vs VOO Performance
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MTRA returned +10.76% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, MTRA is up 2.57% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.5% for MTRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for MTRA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MTRA charges 0.54% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTRA currently yields 0.54% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MTRA and VOO share 1 holdings out of 562 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MTRA | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKNG | 1.28% | 0.21% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MTRA or VOO?
MTRA has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MTRA or VOO?
Over the past year MTRA returned +10.76% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MTRA annualized +7.22% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MTRA or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.5% for MTRA. Worst drawdown: MTRA -15.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MTRA and VOO?
MTRA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MTRA and VOO?
MTRA and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTRA or VOO?
MTRA yields 0.54% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.