MTRA vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMTRAVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.54%0.03%
AUM$138M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.54%1.07%
Holdings683,543
YTD Return+2.57%+13.87%
1Y Return+10.76%+23.31%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.17%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.23%
Volatility (annualized)13.5%15.3%
Max Drawdown-15.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 11, 2025May 24, 2001

MTRA vs VTI Performance

Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MTRA returned +10.76% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, MTRA is up 2.57% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.5% for MTRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for MTRA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MTRA charges 0.54% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTRA currently yields 0.54% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

0.2%overlap

MTRA and VTI share 2 holdings out of 2839 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MTRAWeight in VTIDifference
ILMN1.88%0.03%1.85%
BKNG1.28%0.19%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MTRA or VTI?

MTRA has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MTRA or VTI?

Over the past year MTRA returned +10.76% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MTRA annualized +7.22% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MTRA or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.5% for MTRA. Worst drawdown: MTRA -15.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both MTRA and VTI?

MTRA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between MTRA and VTI?

MTRA and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2839 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MTRA or VTI?

MTRA yields 0.54% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.