MUD vs VTI

MUD vs VTI

Which is better, MUD or VTI?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.61, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMUDVTI
Expense Ratio1.02%0.03%Best
AUM$29M$666.9B
Dividend Yield13.54%1.03%
Holdings93,543
YTD Return-79.36%+11.06%Best
1Y Return-90.69%+15.41%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.48%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.52%
Volatility (annualized)66.9%13.3%Best
Max Drawdown-97.0%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.9 years$497$13,293Best
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 10, 2024May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2024 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.9 years).

MUD vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

MUD vs VTI Performance

Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X ETF (MUD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUD returned -90.69% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, MUD is down 79.36% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MUD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 66.9% compared with 13.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.0% for MUD and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.61. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MUD charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUD currently yields 13.54% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3 holdings in MUD and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 119.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in MUD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 9 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MUD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MUDVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MUD or VTI?

MUD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MUD or VTI?

Over the past year MUD returned -90.69% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MUD annualized -79.40% vs +16.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MUD or VTI?

MUD has been the more volatile fund at 66.9% annualized versus 13.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MUD -97.0% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both MUD and VTI?

MUD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.61, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MUD or VTI?

MUD yields 13.54% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MUD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than MUD?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.61, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.