MUD vs VTI
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $53M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.43% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -77.74% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -93.09% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MUD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X ETF (MUD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUD returned -93.09% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, MUD is down 77.74% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MUD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.0% for MUD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUD charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUD currently yields 14.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MUD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUD or VTI?
MUD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MUD or VTI?
Over the past year MUD returned -93.09% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MUD annualized -80.47% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MUD or VTI?
MUD has been the more volatile fund at 67.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MUD -97.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MUD and VTI?
MUD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MUD and VTI?
MUD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUD or VTI?
MUD yields 14.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MUD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.