MUD vs VOO
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $34M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.41% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -79.27% | +13.49% | |
| 1Y Return | -93.15% | +20.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MUD vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X ETF (MUD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUD returned -93.15% while VOO returned +20.64%. Year to date, MUD is down 79.27% versus a gain of 13.49% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MUD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.0% for MUD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUD charges 1.02% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUD currently yields 11.41% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MUD and VOO share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUD or VOO?
MUD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MUD or VOO?
Over the past year MUD returned -93.15% vs +20.64% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MUD annualized -80.28% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MUD or VOO?
MUD has been the more volatile fund at 67.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MUD -97.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MUD and VOO?
MUD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MUD and VOO?
MUD and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUD or VOO?
MUD yields 11.41% while VOO yields 1.08%, so MUD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.