MVFD vs VTI
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MVFD or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. MVFD is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MVFD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $130M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.02% | +14.05%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.75% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.46% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $12,498 | $15,264Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.6%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Monarch Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2024 to Sep 22, 2026 (2.5 years).
MVFD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
MVFD vs VTI Performance
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD) is an ETF from Monarch Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MVFD returned +13.75% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, MVFD is up 6.02% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MVFD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 12.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for MVFD and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MVFD charges 1.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $3 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MVFD currently yields 1.47% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.4% of MVFD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings MVFD also owns.
Most of MVFD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
38 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in MVFD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 42 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,121 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MVFD (96.1% of the fund), and 1 for MVFD that do not appear in VTI (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MVFD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 3.84% | 0.06% | 3.78% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 3.30% | 0.13% | 3.17% |
| PTENPatterson-Uti Energy Inc | 3.31% | 0.01% | 3.30% |
| APAApa Corp | 3.19% | 0.02% | 3.17% |
| SMSm Energy Co | 3.09% | 0.01% | 3.08% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 2.98% | 0.10% | 2.88% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 2.98% | 0.09% | 2.89% |
| PRPermian Resource | 3.03% | 0.02% | 3.01% |
| KNTKAltus Midstream Company | 2.96% | 0.00% | 2.96% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 2.90% | 0.03% | 2.87% |
95.4% of MVFD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MVFD or VTI?
MVFD has an expense ratio of 1.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MVFD or VTI?
Over the past year MVFD returned +13.75% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MVFD or VTI?
MVFD has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 12.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MVFD -19.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MVFD and VTI?
MVFD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MVFD and VTI?
95.4% of MVFD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's is in holdings MVFD also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in MVFD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MVFD or VTI?
MVFD yields 1.47% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MVFD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MVFD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. MVFD is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.