MVFG vs VOO
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MVFG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MVFG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $179M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.31% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.22% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Monarch Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MVFG vs VOO Performance
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF (MVFG) is a ETF from Monarch Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MVFG returned +23.22% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, MVFG is up 11.31% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.0% for MVFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for MVFG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MVFG charges 1.42% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $142 vs $3 annually, a gap of $139 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MVFG currently yields 1.53% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MVFG and VOO share 1 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MVFG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VEA | 4.06% | 0.01% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MVFG or VOO?
MVFG has an expense ratio of 1.42% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $139 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MVFG or VOO?
Over the past year MVFG returned +23.22% vs +21.63% for VOO, so MVFG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MVFG annualized +16.93% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MVFG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.0% for MVFG. Worst drawdown: MVFG -15.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MVFG and VOO?
MVFG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MVFG and VOO?
MVFG and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MVFG or VOO?
MVFG yields 1.53% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MVFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.