MYN vs VOO
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MYN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.79% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 251 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.57% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.17% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.33% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.66% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 28, 1992 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MYN vs VOO Performance
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc (MYN) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MYN returned +11.17% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, MYN is up 1.57% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, MYN compounded at +6.33% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -2.66% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs -0.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.0% for MYN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.9% for MYN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MYN charges 3.44% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $344 vs $3 annually, a gap of $341 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MYN currently yields 5.79% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MYN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 592 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MYN or VOO?
MYN has an expense ratio of 3.44% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $341 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MYN or VOO?
Over the past year MYN returned +11.17% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MYN annualized -0.38% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MYN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.0% for MYN. Worst drawdown: MYN -57.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MYN and VOO?
MYN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MYN and VOO?
MYN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 592 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MYN or VOO?
MYN yields 5.79% while VOO yields 1.08%, so MYN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.