NBXG vs VXUS
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBXG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | - | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.34% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 137 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.37% | +14.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | +25.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.87% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.78% | +9.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 25, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NBXG vs VXUS Performance
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc (NBXG) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBXG returned +12.95% while VXUS returned +25.40%. Year to date, NBXG is up 10.37% versus a gain of 14.26% for VXUS.
Over three years, NBXG compounded at +24.87% per year against +20.47% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.78% and +9.76% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.8% for NBXG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBXG charges 1.30% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $5 annually, a gap of $125 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBXG currently yields 8.34% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NBXG and VXUS share 8 holdings out of 7913 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBXG or VXUS?
NBXG has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $125 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBXG or VXUS?
Over the past year NBXG returned +12.95% vs +25.40% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NBXG annualized +4.46% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBXG or VXUS?
NBXG has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NBXG -51.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NBXG and VXUS?
NBXG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBXG and VXUS?
NBXG and VXUS share 8 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7913 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBXG or VXUS?
NBXG yields 8.34% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so NBXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.