NBXG vs VXUS
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, NBXG or VXUS?
Each has led over a different period.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NBXG led over 3Y, VXUS over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBXG | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | - | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.12% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 137 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +11.79% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.75% | +22.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.46%Best | +19.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.82% | +8.82%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.8% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,654 | $15,260Best |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 25, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 26, 2021 to Sep 10, 2026 (5.3 years).
NBXG vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
NBXG vs VXUS Performance
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc (NBXG) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBXG returned +11.75% while VXUS returned +22.44%. Year to date, NBXG is up 11.79% versus a gain of 13.35% for VXUS.
Over three years, NBXG compounded at +23.46% per year against +19.44% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.82% and +8.82% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 14.8% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.8% for NBXG and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBXG charges 1.30% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $5 annually, a gap of $125 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBXG currently yields 8.12% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 52 holdings in NBXG and 8,091 in VXUS, totalling 90.5% and 87.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 9 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 150 days apart, NBXG as of Jan 31, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
9 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in NBXG and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 137 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NBXG | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix | 3.90% | 2.17% | 1.73% |
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Adr Representing Nv | 1.75% | 1.70% | 0.05% |
| DIGT:SIDigital Core REIT Management Pte Ltd | 1.71% | 0.00% | 1.71% |
| 6758:JPSony Corp | 1.39% | 0.26% | 1.13% |
| ORCLOracle Corp. | 1.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% |
| 2454:TWMediatek Inc Common Stock TWD10.0 | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.32% |
| TSEM:ILTower Semiconductor Ltd. Share | 1.09% | 0.06% | 1.03% |
| 7974:JPNintendo Co Ltd | 0.73% | 0.10% | 0.63% |
| 9988:HKAlibaba Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBXG and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBXG or VXUS?
NBXG has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $125 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBXG or VXUS?
Over the past year NBXG returned +11.75% vs +22.44% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBXG or VXUS?
NBXG has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 14.8% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NBXG -51.8% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both NBXG and VXUS?
NBXG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBXG or VXUS?
NBXG yields 8.12% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so NBXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than NBXG?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NBXG led over 3Y, VXUS over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.