NBXG vs VTI
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NBXG or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NBXG led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBXG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.12% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 137 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.01% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.57% | +16.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.97%Best | +20.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.35% | +11.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.8% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,977 | $17,537Best |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 25, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 26, 2021 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
NBXG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
NBXG vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc (NBXG) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBXG returned +10.57% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, NBXG is up 12.01% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, NBXG compounded at +23.97% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.35% and +11.89% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.8% for NBXG and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBXG charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBXG currently yields 8.12% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 30.4% of VTI's money is in holdings NBXG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NBXG, our book for it covers 90.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 181 days apart, NBXG as of Jan 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
35 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in NBXG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 137 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NBXG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.45% | 6.40% | 1.95% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.68% | 4.79% | 0.89% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.76% | 3.65% | 2.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.04% | 1.70% | 4.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.27% | 6.29% | 5.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.26% | 2.56% | 0.30% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 4.03% | 0.09% | 3.94% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 2.88% | 0.22% | 2.66% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 2.53% | 0.26% | 2.27% |
| LYVLive Nation Entertainment Inc | 2.70% | 0.04% | 2.66% |
30.4% of VTI is already inside NBXG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBXG or VTI?
NBXG has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBXG or VTI?
Over the past year NBXG returned +10.57% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBXG or VTI?
NBXG has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NBXG -51.8% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both NBXG and VTI?
NBXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NBXG and VTI?
At least 30.4% of VTI's money is in holdings NBXG also owns. Our book for NBXG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in NBXG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBXG or VTI?
NBXG yields 8.12% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NBXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NBXG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NBXG led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.