NBXG vs VTI
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBXG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 137 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.78% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.99% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.94% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.39% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 25, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
NBXG vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc (NBXG) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBXG returned +13.99% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, NBXG is up 9.78% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, NBXG compounded at +24.94% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.39% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.8% for NBXG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBXG charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBXG currently yields 8.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NBXG and VTI share 35 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBXG or VTI?
NBXG has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBXG or VTI?
Over the past year NBXG returned +13.99% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NBXG annualized +4.35% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBXG or VTI?
NBXG has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NBXG -51.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NBXG and VTI?
NBXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBXG and VTI?
NBXG and VTI share 35 common holdings with a 22.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBXG or VTI?
NBXG yields 8.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NBXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.