NDIV vs VYM
Amplify Energy & Natural Resources Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NDIV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDIV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $30M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.67% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +39.18% | +15.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.43% | +22.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.95% | +18.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
NDIV vs VYM Performance
Amplify Energy & Natural Resources Covered Call ETF (NDIV) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NDIV returned +35.43% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, NDIV is up 39.18% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, NDIV compounded at +16.95% per year against +18.81% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, NDIV has the edge at +15.82% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for NDIV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDIV charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDIV currently yields 8.67% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
NDIV and VYM share 7 holdings out of 631 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDIV or VYM?
NDIV has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NDIV or VYM?
Over the past year NDIV returned +35.43% vs +22.23% for VYM, so NDIV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NDIV annualized +15.82% vs +7.02% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NDIV or VYM?
NDIV has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NDIV -19.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both NDIV and VYM?
NDIV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NDIV and VYM?
NDIV and VYM share 7 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 631 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDIV or VYM?
NDIV yields 8.67% while VYM yields 2.24%, so NDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.