NFJ vs SPY

NFJ vs SPY

Which is better, NFJ or SPY?

Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. NFJ led over 1Y, SPY over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NFJ is less concentrated, with 28.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: NFJ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNFJSPY
Expense Ratio0.96%0.09%Best
AUM$1.5B$814.4B
Dividend Yield7.44%1.01%
Holdings182505
YTD Return+26.51%Best+13.34%
1Y Return+31.52%Best+19.97%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.42%+21.20%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.83%+12.81%Best
Volatility (annualized)17.5%14.9%Best
Max Drawdown-70.3%-56.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,267$18,270Best
Top 10 Weight28.2%Best38.0%
Fund FamilyVirtus Investment PartnersState Street Investment Management
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleAllocation/BalancedLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 28, 2005Jan 22, 1993

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2005 to Sep 4, 2026 (21.5 years).

NFJ vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NFJ vs SPY Performance

Virtus Dividend, Interest & Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year NFJ returned +31.52% while SPY returned +19.97%. Year to date, NFJ is up 26.51% versus a gain of 13.34% for SPY.

Over three years, NFJ compounded at +18.42% per year against +21.20% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +8.83% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +9.39% annualized vs -0.08%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NFJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 14.9% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.3% for NFJ and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NFJ charges 0.96% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $9 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NFJ currently yields 7.44% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

NFJ already in SPY61.2%
SPY already in NFJ29.1%

61.2% of NFJ's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 29.1% of SPY's money is in holdings NFJ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 158 days apart, NFJ as of Feb 27, 2026 and SPY as of Aug 4, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

64 positions in common, counted across the 153 positions we hold weights for in NFJ and 504 in SPY, against full books of 182 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 433 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for NFJ (70.5% of the fund), and 81 for NFJ that do not appear in SPY (31.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NFJWeight in SPYDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 371.10%5.50%4.40%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A3.11%3.33%0.22%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.77%1.27%1.50%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.41%1.33%1.08%
PLDPrologis Inc3.51%0.19%3.32%
GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged)3.09%0.41%2.68%
METAMeta Platform Inc 1.50%1.94%0.44%
SCHWSchwab Strategic T3.05%0.26%2.79%
MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd.2.98%0.29%2.69%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.51%1.44%0.07%

61.2% of NFJ is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NFJSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NFJ or SPY?

NFJ has an expense ratio of 0.96% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NFJ or SPY?

Over the past year NFJ returned +31.52% vs +19.97% for SPY, so NFJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), NFJ annualized -0.08% vs +9.39% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NFJ or SPY?

NFJ has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 14.9% for SPY. Worst drawdown: NFJ -70.3% vs SPY -56.5%.

Should I hold both NFJ and SPY?

NFJ and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between NFJ and SPY?

61.2% of NFJ's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 29.1% of SPY's is in holdings NFJ also owns. They hold 64 positions in common, counted across the 153 positions we hold weights for in NFJ and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, NFJ or SPY?

NFJ yields 7.44% while SPY yields 1.01%, so NFJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than NFJ?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. NFJ led over 1Y, SPY over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NFJ is less concentrated, with 28.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.