NOCT vs VOO
NOCT vs VOO
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NOCT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $226M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.40% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.94% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.69% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.31% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NOCT vs VOO Performance
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NOCT returned +13.94% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, NOCT is up 9.40% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, NOCT compounded at +14.69% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.31% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.1% for NOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.2% for NOCT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NOCT charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NOCT currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NOCT or VOO?
NOCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NOCT or VOO?
Over the past year NOCT returned +13.94% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), NOCT annualized +11.15% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NOCT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.1% for NOCT. Worst drawdown: NOCT -16.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NOCT and VOO?
NOCT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, NOCT or VOO?
NOCT yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.