NOVM vs VOO

NOVM vs VOO

Which is better, NOVM or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNOVMVOO
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%Best
AUM$28M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings10509
YTD Return+3.85%+11.55%Best
1Y Return+6.66%+17.54%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.71%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Volatility (annualized)2.7%Best12.8%
Max Drawdown-3.3%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 1.8 years$11,191$13,144Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 15, 2024Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.8 years).

NOVM vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

NOVM vs VOO Performance

FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - November (NOVM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NOVM returned +6.66% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, NOVM is up 3.85% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 2.7% for NOVM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.3% for NOVM and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NOVM charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NOVM currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NOVM and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NOVMVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NOVM or VOO?

NOVM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NOVM or VOO?

Over the past year NOVM returned +6.66% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NOVM annualized +6.45% vs +16.40% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NOVM or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 2.7% for NOVM. Worst drawdown: NOVM -3.3% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both NOVM and VOO?

NOVM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NOVM or VOO?

NOVM yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than NOVM?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.