NUKZ vs VTI
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUKZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $807M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -0.45% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.32% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Range ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
NUKZ vs VTI Performance
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) is a ETF from Range ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUKZ returned +16.32% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, NUKZ is down 0.45% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.0% for NUKZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUKZ charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUKZ currently yields 0.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NUKZ and VTI share 25 holdings out of 2808 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or VTI?
NUKZ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUKZ or VTI?
Over the past year NUKZ returned +16.32% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), NUKZ annualized +45.82% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUKZ or VTI?
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund at 32.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NUKZ -33.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NUKZ and VTI?
NUKZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NUKZ and VTI?
NUKZ and VTI share 25 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2808 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUKZ or VTI?
NUKZ yields 0.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.