NUKZ vs VXUS
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUKZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $807M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.26% | +14.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.73% | +25.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Range ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NUKZ vs VXUS Performance
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) is a ETF from Range ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUKZ returned +16.73% while VXUS returned +25.40%. Year to date, NUKZ is up 0.26% versus a gain of 14.26% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.0% for NUKZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUKZ charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUKZ currently yields 0.92% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NUKZ and VXUS share 13 holdings out of 7902 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or VXUS?
NUKZ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUKZ or VXUS?
Over the past year NUKZ returned +16.73% vs +25.40% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), NUKZ annualized +46.35% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUKZ or VXUS?
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund at 32.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NUKZ -33.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NUKZ and VXUS?
NUKZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NUKZ and VXUS?
NUKZ and VXUS share 13 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7902 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUKZ or VXUS?
NUKZ yields 0.92% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.