NUKZ vs VOO
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NUKZ or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NUKZ led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUKZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $750M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 47 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -2.03% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.12% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.3% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.0% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $25,719Best | $16,033 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Range ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 24, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.6 years).
NUKZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
NUKZ vs VOO Performance
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) is an ETF from Range ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUKZ returned +9.12% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, NUKZ is down 2.03% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.3% compared with 12.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.0% for NUKZ and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUKZ charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUKZ currently yields 0.89% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
26.3% of NUKZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.3% of VOO's money is in holdings NUKZ also owns.
NUKZ and VOO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, NUKZ as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
9 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in NUKZ and 505 in VOO, against full books of 47 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NUKZ (98.2% of the fund), and 18 for NUKZ that do not appear in VOO (26.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUKZ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 3.71% | 0.49% | 3.22% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 3.27% | 0.09% | 3.18% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 2.99% | 0.12% | 2.87% |
| PCGPg&E Corp. | 2.94% | 0.06% | 2.88% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp. | 2.84% | 0.15% | 2.69% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corp | 2.74% | 0.12% | 2.62% |
| JJacobs Engineering Group Inc - Common | 2.84% | 0.02% | 2.82% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 2.69% | 0.08% | 2.61% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 2.25% | 0.16% | 2.09% |
26.3% of NUKZ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or VOO?
NUKZ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NUKZ or VOO?
Over the past year NUKZ returned +9.12% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NUKZ or VOO?
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund at 32.3% annualized versus 12.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NUKZ -33.0% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both NUKZ and VOO?
NUKZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NUKZ and VOO?
26.3% of NUKZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.3% of VOO's is in holdings NUKZ also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in NUKZ and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUKZ or VOO?
NUKZ yields 0.89% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NUKZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NUKZ led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.