NUKZ vs VOO
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUKZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $807M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.45% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.32% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Range ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NUKZ vs VOO Performance
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) is a ETF from Range ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUKZ returned +16.32% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, NUKZ is down 0.45% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.0% for NUKZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUKZ charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUKZ currently yields 0.92% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
NUKZ and VOO share 9 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or VOO?
NUKZ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUKZ or VOO?
Over the past year NUKZ returned +16.32% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), NUKZ annualized +45.82% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUKZ or VOO?
NUKZ has been the more volatile fund at 32.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NUKZ -33.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NUKZ and VOO?
NUKZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NUKZ and VOO?
NUKZ and VOO share 9 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUKZ or VOO?
NUKZ yields 0.92% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.