NXG vs VTI
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NXG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NXG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $482M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.68% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +32.73% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.28% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.77% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.97% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -86.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | The Cushing Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
NXG vs VTI Performance
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is a ETF from The Cushing Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NXG returned +51.28% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, NXG is up 32.73% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, NXG compounded at +38.77% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +18.97% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +0.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.5% for NXG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NXG charges 3.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $315 vs $3 annually, a gap of $312 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NXG currently yields 11.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NXG and VTI share 37 holdings out of 2803 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NXG or VTI?
NXG has an expense ratio of 3.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $312 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NXG or VTI?
Over the past year NXG returned +51.28% vs +22.43% for VTI, so NXG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), NXG annualized +0.93% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NXG or VTI?
NXG has been the more volatile fund at 29.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NXG -86.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NXG and VTI?
NXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NXG and VTI?
NXG and VTI share 37 common holdings with a 3.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2803 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NXG or VTI?
NXG yields 11.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.