NXG vs VTI
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NXG or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NXG led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NXG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $449M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.19% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 76 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +19.50%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +27.10%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.29%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.69%Best | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -86.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,724Best | $18,286 |
| Fund Family | The Cushing Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2012 to Oct 2, 2026 (14 years).
NXG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14 years both funds cover.
NXG vs VTI Performance
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is an ETF from The Cushing Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NXG returned +27.10% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, NXG is up 19.50% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, NXG compounded at +35.29% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.69% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +0.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 14.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.5% for NXG and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NXG charges 3.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $315 vs $3 annually, a gap of $312 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NXG currently yields 12.19% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.4% of VTI's money is in holdings NXG also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for NXG, our book for it lists positions totalling 139.2% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
VTI and NXG share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 61 days apart, NXG as of May 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
41 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in NXG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 76 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NXG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRGNrg Energy | 6.39% | 0.04% | 6.35% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 5.52% | 0.07% | 5.45% |
| TLNTalen Energy Corp Common Stock USD.001 | 5.45% | 0.02% | 5.43% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 5.09% | 0.14% | 4.95% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 4.85% | 0.38% | 4.47% |
| AGXArgan, Inc. | 5.20% | 0.01% | 5.19% |
| PRIMPrimoris Services Corpcommon Stock | 5.04% | 0.01% | 5.03% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 4.92% | 0.12% | 4.80% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 4.94% | 0.08% | 4.86% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 4.75% | 0.26% | 4.49% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NXG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NXG or VTI?
NXG has an expense ratio of 3.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $312 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NXG or VTI?
Over the past year NXG returned +27.10% vs +15.92% for VTI, so NXG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), NXG annualized +0.17% vs +13.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NXG or VTI?
NXG has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 14.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NXG -86.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both NXG and VTI?
NXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NXG and VTI?
At least 3.4% of VTI's money is in holdings NXG also owns. Our book for NXG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in NXG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NXG or VTI?
NXG yields 12.19% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NXG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NXG led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.