NXG vs VOO
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NXG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NXG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $482M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.68% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.73% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.30% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.59% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.57% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -86.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | The Cushing Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NXG vs VOO Performance
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is a ETF from The Cushing Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NXG returned +37.30% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, NXG is up 18.73% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, NXG compounded at +35.59% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +17.57% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.5% for NXG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NXG charges 3.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $315 vs $3 annually, a gap of $312 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NXG currently yields 11.68% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
NXG and VOO share 20 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NXG or VOO?
NXG has an expense ratio of 3.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $312 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NXG or VOO?
Over the past year NXG returned +37.30% vs +21.87% for VOO, so NXG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), NXG annualized +0.13% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NXG or VOO?
NXG has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NXG -86.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NXG and VOO?
NXG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NXG and VOO?
NXG and VOO share 20 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NXG or VOO?
NXG yields 11.68% while VOO yields 1.08%, so NXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.