OARK vs QQQ
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OARK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $31M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 62.19% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 15 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.19% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.63% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.63% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 22, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
OARK vs QQQ Performance
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OARK returned +7.63% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, OARK is up 5.19% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, OARK compounded at +14.63% per year against +26.25% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 29.4% for OARK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.5% for OARK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OARK charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OARK currently yields 62.19% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
OARK and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OARK or QQQ?
OARK has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OARK or QQQ?
Over the past year OARK returned +7.63% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OARK annualized +11.88% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OARK or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 29.4% for OARK. Worst drawdown: OARK -35.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both OARK and QQQ?
OARK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OARK and QQQ?
OARK and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OARK or QQQ?
OARK yields 62.19% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so OARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.