OASC vs VTI
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. OASC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OASC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $90M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 186 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.83% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.65% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | OneAscent Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
OASC vs VTI Performance
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OASC returned +28.65% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, OASC is up 19.83% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OASC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.3% for OASC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OASC charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OASC currently yields 0.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OASC and VTI share 139 holdings out of 2828 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OASC or VTI?
OASC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OASC or VTI?
Over the past year OASC returned +28.65% vs +22.39% for VTI, so OASC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OASC annualized +18.33% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OASC or VTI?
OASC has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OASC -27.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OASC and VTI?
OASC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OASC and VTI?
OASC and VTI share 139 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2828 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OASC or VTI?
OASC yields 0.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.