OASC vs VTI
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, OASC or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. OASC led over 1Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OASC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $94M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 173 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +16.21%Best | +12.95% |
| 1Y Return | +21.87%Best | +19.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.3% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,885 | $14,460Best |
| Fund Family | OneAscent Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 13, 2024 to Sep 8, 2026 (2.2 years).
OASC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
OASC vs VTI Performance
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) is an ETF from OneAscent Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OASC returned +21.87% while VTI returned +19.17%. Year to date, OASC is up 16.21% versus a gain of 12.95% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OASC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 12.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.3% for OASC and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OASC charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OASC currently yields 0.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 68.0% of OASC's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
129 positions in common, counted across the 169 positions we hold weights for in OASC and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 173 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OASC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNDKSandisk Corp | 2.35% | 0.46% | 1.89% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 1.76% | 0.04% | 1.72% |
| CFCf Industries Ho | 1.68% | 0.02% | 1.66% |
| CCKCrown Holdings Inc. | 1.60% | 0.02% | 1.58% |
| WTSWatts Water Technologies Inc | 1.50% | 0.01% | 1.49% |
| SYFSynchrony Financial | 1.47% | 0.04% | 1.43% |
| HTBIHometrust Bancshares, Inc. | 1.49% | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| HIGHartford Financial Services Group Inc. | 1.26% | 0.05% | 1.21% |
| COHRCoherent Corp. | 1.19% | 0.11% | 1.08% |
| VIAVViavi Solutions Inc | 1.27% | 0.02% | 1.25% |
68.0% of OASC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OASC or VTI?
OASC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OASC or VTI?
Over the past year OASC returned +21.87% vs +19.17% for VTI, so OASC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OASC annualized +16.09% vs +18.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OASC or VTI?
OASC has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 12.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OASC -27.3% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both OASC and VTI?
OASC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OASC and VTI?
At least 68.0% of OASC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 129 positions in common, counted across the 169 positions we hold weights for in OASC and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, OASC or VTI?
OASC yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than OASC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. OASC led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.