OMFS vs VXUS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMFS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $288M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 1,126 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.10% | +15.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.73% | +26.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.15% | +9.53% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
OMFS vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMFS returned +24.73% while VXUS returned +26.56%. Year to date, OMFS is up 19.10% versus a gain of 15.77% for VXUS.
Over three years, OMFS compounded at +15.36% per year against +20.47% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.15% and +9.53% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, OMFS has the edge at +10.37% annualized vs +4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OMFS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for OMFS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMFS charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFS currently yields 1.09% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
OMFS and VXUS share 9 holdings out of 8769 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMFS or VXUS?
OMFS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OMFS or VXUS?
Over the past year OMFS returned +24.73% vs +26.56% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFS annualized +10.37% vs +4.91% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OMFS or VXUS?
OMFS has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: OMFS -42.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both OMFS and VXUS?
OMFS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OMFS and VXUS?
OMFS and VXUS share 9 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8769 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMFS or VXUS?
OMFS yields 1.09% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.