OSCV vs QQQ
Opus Small Cap Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OSCV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $708M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.78% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.15% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.55% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.07% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 18, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
OSCV vs QQQ Performance
Opus Small Cap Value ETF (OSCV) is a ETF from Aptus ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OSCV returned +13.15% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, OSCV is up 13.78% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, OSCV compounded at +11.55% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.07% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +6.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.6% for OSCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for OSCV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OSCV charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OSCV currently yields 1.05% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
OSCV and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 167 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OSCV or QQQ?
OSCV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OSCV or QQQ?
Over the past year OSCV returned +13.15% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), OSCV annualized +6.70% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OSCV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.6% for OSCV. Worst drawdown: OSCV -42.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both OSCV and QQQ?
OSCV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OSCV and QQQ?
OSCV and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 167 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OSCV or QQQ?
OSCV yields 1.05% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so OSCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.