OSEA vs QQQ

OSEA vs QQQ

Which is better, OSEA or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. OSEA is less concentrated, with 44.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQLess Concentrated: OSEA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOSEAQQQ
Expense Ratio0.55%0.18%Best
AUM$387M$498.6B
Dividend Yield1.23%0.42%
Holdings38321
YTD Return-3.42%+22.67%Best
1Y Return-1.69%+24.33%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+10.24%+29.05%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+17.00%
Volatility (annualized)14.4%Best17.8%
Max Drawdown-18.1%Best-22.8%
$10,000 over 4.1 years$15,165$25,786Best
Top 10 Weight44.5%Best47.2%
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 6, 2022Mar 10, 1999

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 8, 2022 to Oct 2, 2026 (4.1 years).

OSEA vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.

OSEA vs QQQ Performance

Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OSEA returned -1.69% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, OSEA is down 3.42% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.

Over three years, OSEA compounded at +10.24% per year against +29.05% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +25.99% annualized vs +10.69%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 14.4% for OSEA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for OSEA and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OSEA charges 0.55% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $18 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OSEA currently yields 1.23% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

OSEA already in QQQ2.9%
QQQ already in OSEA0.4%

2.9% of OSEA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings OSEA also owns.

OSEA and QQQ share little of their money.

1 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in OSEA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 38 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for OSEA (97.3% of the fund), and 1 for OSEA that do not appear in QQQ (2.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OSEAWeight in QQQDifference
MELIMercadolibre Inc2.90%0.42%2.48%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of OSEA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

OSEAQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OSEA or QQQ?

OSEA has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, OSEA or QQQ?

Over the past year OSEA returned -1.69% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OSEA annualized +10.69% vs +25.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, OSEA or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 14.4% for OSEA. Worst drawdown: OSEA -18.1% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both OSEA and QQQ?

OSEA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between OSEA and QQQ?

2.9% of OSEA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.4% of QQQ's is in holdings OSEA also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in OSEA and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, OSEA or QQQ?

OSEA yields 1.23% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so OSEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than OSEA?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. OSEA is less concentrated, with 44.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.