OSEA vs VTI
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OSEA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $470M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.24% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.62% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.35% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.74% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 6, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
OSEA vs VTI Performance
Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OSEA returned +7.35% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, OSEA is up 1.62% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, OSEA compounded at +8.74% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, OSEA has the edge at +12.54% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.5% for OSEA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for OSEA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OSEA charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OSEA currently yields 1.24% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OSEA and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2812 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OSEA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIN:IE | 3.46% | 0.33% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OSEA or VTI?
OSEA has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OSEA or VTI?
Over the past year OSEA returned +7.35% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OSEA annualized +12.54% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OSEA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.5% for OSEA. Worst drawdown: OSEA -18.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OSEA and VTI?
OSEA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OSEA and VTI?
OSEA and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2812 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OSEA or VTI?
OSEA yields 1.24% while VTI yields 1.07%, so OSEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.