OSEA vs VYM

OSEA vs VYM

Which is better, OSEA or VYM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOSEAVYM
Expense Ratio0.55%0.04%Best
AUM$432M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.23%2.22%
Holdings38613
YTD Return-1.93%+11.47%Best
1Y Return+1.72%+15.94%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+9.79%+18.03%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.35%
Volatility (annualized)14.4%12.8%Best
Max Drawdown-18.1%-14.5%Best
$10,000 over 4 years$15,290$16,919Best
Top 10 Weight44.3%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionSep 6, 2022Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 8, 2022 to Sep 21, 2026 (4 years).

OSEA vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.

OSEA vs VYM Performance

Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OSEA returned +1.72% while VYM returned +15.94%. Year to date, OSEA is down 1.93% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.

Over three years, OSEA compounded at +9.79% per year against +18.03% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +14.05% annualized vs +11.20%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OSEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 12.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for OSEA and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OSEA charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OSEA currently yields 1.23% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 31 holdings in OSEA and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.8% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in OSEA and 557 in VYM, against full books of 38 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for OSEA (97.1% of the fund), and 2 for OSEA that do not appear in VYM (5.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of OSEA and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

OSEAVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OSEA or VYM?

OSEA has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, OSEA or VYM?

Over the past year OSEA returned +1.72% vs +15.94% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OSEA annualized +11.20% vs +14.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, OSEA or VYM?

OSEA has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 12.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: OSEA -18.1% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both OSEA and VYM?

OSEA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, OSEA or VYM?

OSEA yields 1.23% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than OSEA?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.