PALL vs QQQ
abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PALL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $667M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -18.78% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.00% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.75% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -10.67% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 8, 2010 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PALL vs QQQ Performance
abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PALL returned +19.00% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, PALL is down 18.78% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, PALL compounded at +1.75% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -10.67% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 29.7% for PALL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.6% for PALL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PALL charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PALL currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PALL or QQQ?
PALL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PALL or QQQ?
Over the past year PALL returned +19.00% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), PALL annualized +6.40% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PALL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 29.7% for PALL. Worst drawdown: PALL -73.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PALL and QQQ?
PALL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, PALL or QQQ?
PALL yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.