PALL vs VYM

PALL vs VYM

Which is better, PALL or VYM?

Precious Metals against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPALLVYM
Expense Ratio0.60%0.04%Best
AUM$703M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings2613
YTD Return-20.49%+11.35%Best
1Y Return+12.29%+15.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+0.66%+17.22%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-7.70%+12.30%Best
Volatility (annualized)29.7%13.2%Best
Max Drawdown-73.6%-35.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$6,699$17,861Best
Fund FamilyAberdeenVanguard (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StylePrecious MetalsLarge Cap Value
InceptionJan 8, 2010Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 8, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.7 years).

PALL vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.7 years both funds cover.

PALL vs VYM Performance

abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PALL returned +12.29% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, PALL is down 20.49% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Over three years, PALL compounded at +0.66% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -7.70% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.89% annualized vs +6.23%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PALL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.7% compared with 13.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.6% for PALL and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PALL charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PALL currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PALL and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PALLVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PALL or VYM?

PALL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PALL or VYM?

Over the past year PALL returned +12.29% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), PALL annualized +6.23% vs +9.89% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PALL or VYM?

PALL has been the more volatile fund at 29.7% annualized versus 13.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PALL -73.6% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both PALL and VYM?

PALL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PALL or VYM?

PALL yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than PALL?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.