PCGG vs VXUS
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCGG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | - | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -3.20% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.41% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.60% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PCGG vs VXUS Performance
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PCGG returned -5.41% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, PCGG is down 3.20% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, PCGG compounded at +4.60% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for PCGG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCGG charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCGG currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PCGG and VXUS share 6 holdings out of 7887 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCGG or VXUS?
PCGG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PCGG or VXUS?
Over the past year PCGG returned -5.41% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), PCGG annualized +4.60% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PCGG or VXUS?
PCGG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PCGG -22.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PCGG and VXUS?
PCGG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PCGG and VXUS?
PCGG and VXUS share 6 common holdings with a 2.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7887 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCGG or VXUS?
PCGG yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.