PCGG vs VXUS
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, PCGG or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCGG | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | - | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 39 | 8,747 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $11,507 | $17,297Best |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 21 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. PCGG has data through Aug 14, 2026 and VXUS through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 30, 2023 to Aug 14, 2026 (3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for PCGG and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCGG charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCGG currently yields 0.00% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 35 holdings in PCGG and 8,094 in VXUS, totalling 94.3% and 87.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 5 positions appear in both.
5 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PCGG and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 39 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PCGG and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCGG or VXUS?
PCGG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, PCGG or VXUS?
PCGG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PCGG -22.7% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both PCGG and VXUS?
PCGG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCGG or VXUS?
PCGG yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than PCGG?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.