PCGG vs VYM
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PCGG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCGG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | - | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 39 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $11,507 | $16,903Best |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 21 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. PCGG has data through Aug 14, 2026 and VYM through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 30, 2023 to Aug 14, 2026 (3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for PCGG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCGG charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCGG currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 8.8% of VYM's money is in holdings PCGG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for PCGG, our book for it covers 94.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VYM and PCGG share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PCGG and 603 in VYM, against full books of 39 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PCGG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCGG or VYM?
PCGG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, PCGG or VYM?
PCGG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PCGG -22.7% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both PCGG and VYM?
PCGG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PCGG and VYM?
At least 8.8% of VYM's money is in holdings PCGG also owns. Our book for PCGG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PCGG and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCGG or VYM?
PCGG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PCGG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.