PCGG vs VTI
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PCGG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCGG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 39 | 3,524 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $11,507 | $17,963Best |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 48 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. PCGG has data through Aug 14, 2026 and VTI through Oct 1, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 30, 2023 to Aug 14, 2026 (3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for PCGG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCGG charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 26.6% of VTI's money is in holdings PCGG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for PCGG, our book for it covers 94.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and PCGG share little of their money.
21 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PCGG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 39 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PCGG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.51% | 6.40% | 0.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.74% | 4.79% | 0.05% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 6.31% | 2.31% | 4.00% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.95% | 3.65% | 0.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.76% | 2.56% | 2.20% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.10% | 1.35% | 3.75% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 5.18% | 0.83% | 4.35% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 4.82% | 0.63% | 4.19% |
| AONAon Plc | 3.62% | 0.10% | 3.52% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 3.20% | 0.52% | 2.68% |
26.6% of VTI is already inside PCGG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCGG or VTI?
PCGG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, PCGG or VTI?
PCGG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PCGG -22.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both PCGG and VTI?
PCGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PCGG and VTI?
At least 26.6% of VTI's money is in holdings PCGG also owns. Our book for PCGG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PCGG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCGG or VTI?
PCGG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PCGG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.