PCGG vs VTI
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCGG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.21% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.62% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.94% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
PCGG vs VTI Performance
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PCGG returned -4.62% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, PCGG is down 2.21% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, PCGG compounded at +4.94% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.2% for PCGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for PCGG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCGG charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PCGG and VTI share 19 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCGG or VTI?
PCGG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PCGG or VTI?
Over the past year PCGG returned -4.62% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), PCGG annualized +4.94% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PCGG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.2% for PCGG. Worst drawdown: PCGG -22.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PCGG and VTI?
PCGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PCGG and VTI?
PCGG and VTI share 19 common holdings with a 24.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCGG or VTI?
PCGG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.