PCGG vs VOO
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCGG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -3.24% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.00% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.56% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PCGG vs VOO Performance
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PCGG returned -5.00% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, PCGG is down 3.24% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, PCGG compounded at +4.56% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for PCGG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCGG charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PCGG and VOO share 20 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCGG or VOO?
PCGG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PCGG or VOO?
Over the past year PCGG returned -5.00% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), PCGG annualized +4.56% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PCGG or VOO?
PCGG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PCGG -22.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PCGG and VOO?
PCGG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PCGG and VOO?
PCGG and VOO share 20 common holdings with a 27.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCGG or VOO?
PCGG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.