PEO vs VYM
Adams Natural Resources Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PEO or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PEO led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PEO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $740M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.18% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 53 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +27.04%Best | +10.96% |
| 1Y Return | +30.17%Best | +15.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.42% | +17.78%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.31%Best | +12.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -70.9% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,271Best | $17,663 |
| Top 10 Weight | 66.4% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Adams Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 30, 1929 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 22, 2026 (19.8 years).
PEO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
PEO vs VYM Performance
Adams Natural Resources Fund (PEO) is an ETF from Adams Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PEO returned +30.17% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, PEO is up 27.04% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Over three years, PEO compounded at +14.42% per year against +17.78% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +21.31% and +12.05% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PEO has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +6.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PEO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.9% for PEO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PEO charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PEO currently yields 11.18% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
87.8% of PEO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.2% of VYM's money is in holdings PEO also owns.
Most of PEO is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
36 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in PEO and 557 in VYM, against full books of 53 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PEO (85.9% of the fund), and 12 for PEO that do not appear in VYM (8.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PEO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 23.93% | 2.63% | 21.30% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 12.64% | 1.48% | 11.16% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 6.01% | 0.60% | 5.41% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 3.62% | 0.90% | 2.72% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 4.11% | 0.35% | 3.76% |
| VLOValero Energy | 3.85% | 0.38% | 3.47% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 3.31% | 0.30% | 3.01% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 3.11% | 0.34% | 2.77% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 3.19% | 0.23% | 2.96% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 2.66% | 0.38% | 2.28% |
87.8% of PEO is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PEO or VYM?
PEO has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PEO or VYM?
Over the past year PEO returned +30.17% vs +15.42% for VYM, so PEO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PEO annualized +7.01% vs +6.80% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PEO or VYM?
PEO has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PEO -70.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PEO and VYM?
PEO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PEO and VYM?
87.8% of PEO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.2% of VYM's is in holdings PEO also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in PEO and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PEO or VYM?
PEO yields 11.18% while VYM yields 2.22%, so PEO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PEO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PEO led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.