PEO vs VYM
Adams Natural Resources Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PEO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PEO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $740M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.17% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +25.36% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.41% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.82% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.51% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Adams Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 1929 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PEO vs VYM Performance
Adams Natural Resources Fund (PEO) is a ETF from Adams Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PEO returned +33.41% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, PEO is up 25.36% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, PEO compounded at +13.82% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +20.51% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PEO has the edge at +10.32% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PEO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.9% for PEO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PEO charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PEO currently yields 12.17% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PEO and VYM share 34 holdings out of 580 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PEO or VYM?
PEO has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PEO or VYM?
Over the past year PEO returned +33.41% vs +26.05% for VYM, so PEO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PEO annualized +10.32% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PEO or VYM?
PEO has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PEO -70.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PEO and VYM?
PEO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PEO and VYM?
PEO and VYM share 34 common holdings with a 10.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 580 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PEO or VYM?
PEO yields 12.17% while VYM yields 2.86%, so PEO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.