PEZ vs VTI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PEZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.24% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.64% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.46% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.72% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
PEZ vs VTI Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PEZ returned +1.46% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, PEZ is down 2.64% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, PEZ compounded at +13.40% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.72% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.0% for PEZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PEZ charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PEZ currently yields 0.24% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PEZ and VTI share 35 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PEZ or VTI?
PEZ has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PEZ or VTI?
Over the past year PEZ returned +1.46% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PEZ annualized +7.34% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PEZ or VTI?
PEZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PEZ -59.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PEZ and VTI?
PEZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PEZ and VTI?
PEZ and VTI share 35 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PEZ or VTI?
PEZ yields 0.24% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.