PPA vs SPY
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. PPA delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PPA | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $8.7B | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +14.98% | +14.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.48% | +21.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.70% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.89% | +13.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2005 | Jan 22, 1993 |
PPA vs SPY Performance
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year PPA returned +26.48% while SPY returned +21.71%. Year to date, PPA is up 14.98% versus a gain of 14.24% for SPY.
Over three years, PPA compounded at +30.70% per year against +22.10% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +20.89% and +13.21% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, PPA has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PPA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.8% for PPA and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PPA charges 0.58% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $9 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PPA currently yields 0.37% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
PPA and SPY share 21 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PPA or SPY?
PPA has an expense ratio of 0.58% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PPA or SPY?
Over the past year PPA returned +26.48% vs +21.71% for SPY, so PPA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), PPA annualized +13.03% vs +8.86% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PPA or SPY?
PPA has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: PPA -57.8% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both PPA and SPY?
PPA and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PPA and SPY?
PPA and SPY share 21 common holdings with a 3.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PPA or SPY?
PPA yields 0.37% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.