PRFZ vs SCHD
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. PRFZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. PRFZ offers more diversification with 1314 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRFZ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 1,554 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +21.40% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.37% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.70% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.99% | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2006 | Oct 20, 2011 |
PRFZ vs SCHD Performance
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PRFZ returned +35.37% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, PRFZ is up 21.40% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, PRFZ compounded at +17.70% per year against +15.40% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.99% and +9.70% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.45% annualized vs +9.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRFZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.0% for PRFZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRFZ charges 0.34% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $6 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRFZ currently yields 0.77% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
PRFZ and SCHD share 30 holdings out of 1384 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRFZ or SCHD?
PRFZ has an expense ratio of 0.34% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRFZ or SCHD?
Over the past year PRFZ returned +35.37% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so PRFZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), PRFZ annualized +9.34% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRFZ or SCHD?
PRFZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: PRFZ -63.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both PRFZ and SCHD?
PRFZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRFZ and SCHD?
PRFZ and SCHD share 30 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1384 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRFZ or SCHD?
PRFZ yields 0.77% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.