PRN vs VOO
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PRN or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PRN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PRN is less concentrated, with 36.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $372M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 41 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.05% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.28%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.05%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.41%Best | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,603Best | $18,335 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 4, 2026 (16 years).
PRN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
PRN vs VOO Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRN returned +22.28% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, PRN is up 11.05% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, PRN compounded at +24.05% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.41% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PRN has the edge at +14.89% annualized vs +13.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.3% for PRN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRN charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRN currently yields 0.10% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
28.6% of PRN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.5% of VOO's money is in holdings PRN also owns.
PRN and VOO share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in PRN and 505 in VOO, against full books of 41 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 45 and 505 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 489 positions PRN does not, 98.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.51%, AAPL 6.59%, MSFT 4.30%, AMZN 3.62%, GOOGL 3.25%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PRN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 4.77% | 0.11% | 4.66% |
| HWMHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 4.48% | 0.17% | 4.31% |
| PWRQuanta | 4.45% | 0.17% | 4.28% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 3.13% | 0.76% | 2.37% |
| JBLJabil, Inc. | 3.73% | 0.06% | 3.67% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 3.64% | 0.06% | 3.58% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 2.36% | 0.06% | 2.30% |
| CMICummins Inc. | 2.07% | 0.15% | 1.92% |
28.6% of PRN is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRN or VOO?
PRN has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PRN or VOO?
Over the past year PRN returned +22.28% vs +20.08% for VOO, so PRN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PRN annualized +14.89% vs +13.48% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PRN or VOO?
PRN has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PRN -36.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PRN and VOO?
PRN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PRN and VOO?
28.6% of PRN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.5% of VOO's is in holdings PRN also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in PRN and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRN or VOO?
PRN yields 0.10% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PRN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PRN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PRN is less concentrated, with 36.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.