PSAI vs VTI

PSAI vs VTI

Which is better, PSAI or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSAI is less concentrated, with 23.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: PSAI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPSAIVTI
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.01%1.03%
Holdings1023,543
YTD Return+9.65%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-+16.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Top 10 Weight23.4%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 7, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PSAI vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PSAI vs VTI Performance

Pacer S&P 500 3AI Top 100 ETF (PSAI) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PSAI is up 9.65% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PSAI charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSAI currently yields 0.01% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

PSAI already in VTI99.0%
VTI already in PSAI45.2%

99.0% of PSAI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.2% of VTI's money is in holdings PSAI also owns.

Most of PSAI is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

98 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PSAI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 102 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,053 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PSAI (52.3% of the fund), and 3 for PSAI that do not appear in VTI (0.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PSAIWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp0.79%6.40%5.61%
AAPLApple, Inc0.74%6.29%5.55%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp0.67%4.79%4.12%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.56%3.65%2.09%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A1.47%2.90%1.43%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.32%1.70%0.62%
KLACKla Corp3.60%0.33%3.27%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.17%2.31%1.14%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.74%2.56%1.82%
DASHDoordash Inc - A2.87%0.10%2.77%

99.0% of PSAI is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PSAIVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PSAI or VTI?

PSAI has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PSAI and VTI?

99.0% of PSAI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.2% of VTI's is in holdings PSAI also owns. They hold 98 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PSAI and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, PSAI or VTI?

PSAI yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than PSAI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSAI is less concentrated, with 23.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.