PSC vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. PSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: PSCMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPSCVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.38%0.04%
AUM$2.2B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.55%2.86%
Holdings513568
YTD Return+20.69%+15.80%
1Y Return+33.12%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.87%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.84%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)20.9%14.6%
Max Drawdown-47.9%-58.8%
Fund FamilyPrincipal FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 21, 2016Nov 10, 2006

PSC vs VYM Performance

Principal U.S. Small-Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) is a ETF from Principal Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSC returned +33.12% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, PSC is up 20.69% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, PSC compounded at +17.87% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.84% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, PSC has the edge at +11.49% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.9% for PSC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PSC charges 0.38% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $4 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSC currently yields 0.55% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

0.9%overlap

PSC and VYM share 66 holdings out of 1001 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PSCWeight in VYMDifference
BFH0.78%0.01%0.77%
PTEN0.67%0.01%0.66%
WT0.66%0.01%0.65%
HWCProProPro
LBRTProProPro
FCFSProProPro
BKHProProPro
SIGIProProPro
AUBProProPro
TEXProProPro
See all 10 holdings PSC shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PSC or VYM?

PSC has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.

Which performed better, PSC or VYM?

Over the past year PSC returned +33.12% vs +26.12% for VYM, so PSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), PSC annualized +11.49% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, PSC or VYM?

PSC has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PSC -47.9% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both PSC and VYM?

PSC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between PSC and VYM?

PSC and VYM share 66 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1001 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, PSC or VYM?

PSC yields 0.55% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →