PSCT vs VXUS
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PSCT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $493M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +43.54% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +76.11% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.73% | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.91% | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PSCT vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCT returned +76.11% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, PSCT is up 43.54% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Over three years, PSCT compounded at +21.73% per year against +19.79% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.91% and +9.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PSCT has the edge at +15.18% annualized vs +4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for PSCT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCT charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCT currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PSCT and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7930 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCT or VXUS?
PSCT has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCT or VXUS?
Over the past year PSCT returned +76.11% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so PSCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCT annualized +15.18% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCT or VXUS?
PSCT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PSCT -40.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PSCT and VXUS?
PSCT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCT and VXUS?
PSCT and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7930 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCT or VXUS?
PSCT yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.