PSCT vs VYM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PSCT or VYM?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PSCT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $472M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 71 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +36.14%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +48.16%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.42%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.15% | +12.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,965 | $17,861Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.4 years).
PSCT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.4 years both funds cover.
PSCT vs VYM Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCT returned +48.16% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, PSCT is up 36.14% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, PSCT compounded at +21.42% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.15% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PSCT has the edge at +14.71% annualized vs +9.85%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 13.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for PSCT and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCT charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCT currently yields 0.01% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
6.7% of PSCT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings PSCT also owns.
PSCT and VYM share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in PSCT and 557 in VYM, against full books of 71 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 524 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PSCT (97.0% of the fund), and 67 for PSCT that do not appear in VYM (92.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSCT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCT or VYM?
PSCT has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSCT or VYM?
Over the past year PSCT returned +48.16% vs +15.34% for VYM, so PSCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCT annualized +14.71% vs +9.85% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSCT or VYM?
PSCT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 13.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PSCT -40.4% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both PSCT and VYM?
PSCT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCT and VYM?
6.7% of PSCT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings PSCT also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in PSCT and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCT or VYM?
PSCT yields 0.01% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PSCT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PSCT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.