PSCT vs VYM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PSCT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $493M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +43.76% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +82.53% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.20% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.76% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PSCT vs VYM Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCT returned +82.53% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, PSCT is up 43.76% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, PSCT compounded at +21.20% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.76% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PSCT has the edge at +15.20% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for PSCT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCT charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCT currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PSCT and VYM share 4 holdings out of 623 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCT or VYM?
PSCT has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCT or VYM?
Over the past year PSCT returned +82.53% vs +26.12% for VYM, so PSCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCT annualized +15.20% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCT or VYM?
PSCT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PSCT -40.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PSCT and VYM?
PSCT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCT and VYM?
PSCT and VYM share 4 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 623 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCT or VYM?
PSCT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.