PSCT vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PSCT or VTI?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSCT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. PSCT is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $472M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 71 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +39.42%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +56.55%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.69%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.72% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,639 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2010 to Sep 25, 2026 (16.5 years).
PSCT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.5 years both funds cover.
PSCT vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCT returned +56.55% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, PSCT is up 39.42% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCT compounded at +23.69% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.72% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, PSCT has the edge at +14.85% annualized vs +12.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for PSCT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCT charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCT currently yields 0.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.5% of PSCT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings PSCT also owns.
Most of PSCT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
68 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in PSCT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 71 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,126 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PSCT (97.2% of the fund), and 4 for PSCT that do not appear in VTI (3.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSCT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VSATViasat Inc | 4.10% | 0.01% | 4.09% |
| FORMFormfactor, Inc. | 3.52% | 0.01% | 3.51% |
| QRVOQorvo Inc_None_0 | 3.45% | 0.01% | 3.44% |
| RALRalliant Corp | 3.10% | 0.01% | 3.09% |
| PLXSPlexus Corp | 2.87% | 0.01% | 2.86% |
| EPAMEpam Systems, Inc. | 2.76% | 0.01% | 2.75% |
| ACIWAci Worldwide Inc | 2.43% | 0.01% | 2.42% |
| RNGRingcentral Inc, Class A | 2.31% | 0.01% | 2.30% |
| MXLMaxlinear Inc | 2.26% | 0.01% | 2.25% |
| BOXBox Inc - Class A | 2.22% | 0.01% | 2.21% |
96.5% of PSCT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCT or VTI?
PSCT has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSCT or VTI?
Over the past year PSCT returned +56.55% vs +18.17% for VTI, so PSCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), PSCT annualized +14.85% vs +12.33% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSCT or VTI?
PSCT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSCT -40.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both PSCT and VTI?
PSCT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCT and VTI?
96.5% of PSCT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings PSCT also owns. They hold 68 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in PSCT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCT or VTI?
PSCT yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PSCT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSCT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. PSCT is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.