PSCT vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSCT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $493M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +41.60% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +80.11% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.20% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
PSCT vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCT returned +80.11% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, PSCT is up 41.60% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCT compounded at +21.20% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PSCT has the edge at +15.08% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for PSCT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCT charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCT currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSCT and VTI share 52 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCT or VTI?
PSCT has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCT or VTI?
Over the past year PSCT returned +80.11% vs +23.31% for VTI, so PSCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCT annualized +15.08% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCT or VTI?
PSCT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSCT -40.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSCT and VTI?
PSCT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCT and VTI?
PSCT and VTI share 52 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCT or VTI?
PSCT yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.