PSL vs VTI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Staples Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $84M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.31% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.08% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.17% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.69% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
PSL vs VTI Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSL returned +3.08% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, PSL is up 14.31% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, PSL compounded at +10.17% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.69% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PSL has the edge at +8.27% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.9% for PSL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.0% for PSL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSL charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSL currently yields 0.75% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSL and VTI share 42 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSL or VTI?
PSL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSL or VTI?
Over the past year PSL returned +3.08% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PSL annualized +8.27% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.9% for PSL. Worst drawdown: PSL -42.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSL and VTI?
PSL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSL and VTI?
PSL and VTI share 42 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSL or VTI?
PSL yields 0.75% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.