QDTY vs QQQ
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDTY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.17% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $26M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 36.63% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.93% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.41% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QDTY vs QQQ Performance
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QDTY returned +23.41% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, QDTY is up 13.93% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.0% for QDTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.2% for QDTY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDTY charges 1.17% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $117 vs $18 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDTY currently yields 36.63% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QDTY and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDTY or QQQ?
QDTY has an expense ratio of 1.17% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDTY or QQQ?
Over the past year QDTY returned +23.41% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QDTY annualized +25.57% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDTY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.0% for QDTY. Worst drawdown: QDTY -20.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QDTY and QQQ?
QDTY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QDTY and QQQ?
QDTY and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDTY or QQQ?
QDTY yields 36.63% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QDTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.