QDTY vs VOO
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDTY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.17% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $24M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 31.34% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.06% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.54% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QDTY vs VOO Performance
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDTY returned +22.54% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, QDTY is up 12.06% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QDTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.2% for QDTY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDTY charges 1.17% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $117 vs $3 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDTY currently yields 31.34% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QDTY and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDTY or VOO?
QDTY has an expense ratio of 1.17% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDTY or VOO?
Over the past year QDTY returned +22.54% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QDTY annualized +24.34% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDTY or VOO?
QDTY has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QDTY -20.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QDTY and VOO?
QDTY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QDTY and VOO?
QDTY and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDTY or VOO?
QDTY yields 31.34% while VOO yields 1.09%, so QDTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.